Santiago is in the first year of his Ph.D. program. Although he is familiar with literature review, he is not familiar with the concept of research topic selection. During a one-on-one meeting, his Ph.D. advisor shares some insights with him on this topic.  

Santiago: Good morning, Dr. Jones. I have identified a few research gaps in the existing literature on artificial intelligence. However, I am not entirely sure about what topic to select for my first research project. Could you help me understand the concept better? 

Dr. Jones: Absolutely, Santiago. I am here to mentor you, and this is a part of my responsibility. Although I will not dictate the topic to you, I will identify all the strategies with which you can identify your own research topic. Sounds good? 

Santiago: Yes, Dr. Jones.  

Identifying a good research topic is crucial because it lays the foundation for a successful research project. It ensures your work is relevant and meaningful, while keeping you motivated and engaged, as you will be exploring a subject that genuinely interests you. In today’s blog post, I will discuss the key insights shared by Dr. Jones on research topic selection.            

Step 1: Undertake a comprehensive literature review and ensure you identify all existing challenges and controversies in your field of study. Avoid selectively focusing on a few articles and ignoring the rest, as this can introduce unnecessary bias. Answer several key questions at this stage. For instance, are you looking forward to addressing a controversy from your field or planning to propose something so extraordinary that nobody has thought about it before?     

Step 2: Find legitimate answers to the following four key questions:  

• Why do you believe this topic is important?  
• How do you plan to conduct your experiments?  
• What type of data is likely to result from these experiments?  
• What could be the real-world implications of these data, however small or large?  

Note: Many early Ph.D. projects often require a complete revamp if the data are not sufficiently meaningful or promising. Therefore, keep questioning yourself throughout the process. Ideally, maintain a record of all interesting questions, whether raised by you or someone else during group meetings.    

Step 3: Note down all the shortlisted research topics and identify those that appeal to you the most. You need to identify an interesting topic that you really care about. This decision could be based on multiple factors including the following: 

• Availability of the anticipated research funding 
• Access to specialized laboratory equipment 
• Knowledge of cutting-edge laboratory techniques 
• Prior work in related areas  
• Current or future possibilities in the field   

Step 4: Focus on the nature of the proposed work: Is it based on interdisciplinary, multidisciplinary, or convergence research? Would you need input from current or past collaborators? 

Step 5: Ask yourself the following questions: Through this research, do I aim to make an incremental contribution or a groundbreaking advancement in my field of study? If incremental, how does it improve upon existing knowledge? If groundbreaking, what fundamental gap is it likely to address? 

Although both types of research have their own significance, you need to choose at an early stage to streamline the process. The target journal also needs to be identified accordingly. Of course, depending on the outcome, the direction of the project can change significantly at times. However, careful planning helps streamline the end-to-end process that starts with a careful literature review and concludes after meaningful publication. 

Step 6: Before addressing the research gap, ensure that the hypothesis is clear, specific, and testable.  

Step 7: Ensure compliance with research integrity and ethics. For example, some studies may require approval from an Institutional Review Board (IRB) and/or a specially appointed ethics committee.  

Step 8: Present all identified ideas to your research advisor, peers, senior group members, other knowledgeable experts, current/past collaborators, etc., and seek their advice. While it is easy for one person to overlook an important perspective, experts can quickly identify any oversights and provide a more comprehensive and distilled view.        

Step 9: Define realistic milestones for each stage of your study—literature review, data collection, analysis, manuscript drafting, etc.—to effectively track your progress against set timelines once the project begins.   

Step 10: After identifying the research gap, take steps to address the most important question and refine it as needed throughout the process.

Top 5 Mistakes to Avoid During Research Topic Selection  

As mentioned in my previous blog, researchers should make it a point to conduct a comprehensive literature review as a first step to identifying a good research topic. Failing to do so can adversely affect the quality of the chosen research topic. The topic could nevertheless be significant, but it may leave some key questions unaddressed. Here are the five most common mistakes made while identifying a good research topic: 

• Conducting a poor or non-comprehensive literature review 
• Proposing experiments without considering research integrity and ethical standards  
• Selecting a research topic that is either too broad or too narrow 
• Not consulting your advisor, peers, senior researchers, and other qualified researchers such as collaborators 
• Identifying a research topic that you or your collaborators cannot work on owing to technical or resource limitations  

Summary  

Identifying a good research topic is of paramount significance in research publishing. A carefully chosen research topic can provide a significant boost to your career, while poor choices can adversely impact it. Dr. Jones provides valuable insights into selecting a meaningful research topic and highlights the most common mistakes made during this process. 

Key Takeaways 

• Conduct a meticulous literature review to ensure a solid foundation for your proposed study. 
• Relentlessly question your assumptions and refine the key question as and when required.  
• Consider key factors such as resource availability, funding opportunities, expertise, and support from collaborators. 
• Align your research with prevailing research integrity and ethical standards. 
• Avoid common mistakes such as incomplete literature reviews, selecting overly broad or narrow topics, proposing unfeasible experiments, and neglecting expert consultation. 

---

Quiz for the Curious  

Santiago’s friend, Dr. Tanay, realizes that his research work can potentially resolve a huge controversy in his field. He chooses to refer to published papers that support his hypothesis, while ignoring those that do not support it. By doing so, what mistake is Dr. Tanay committing?    

(A) Conducting a comprehensive literature review

(B) Introducing bias in his research

(C) Unnecessarily questioning himself

(D) Ensuring compliance with research integrity standards 

---

Answer: (B)